Legal Opinion

In re Armored Car Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided November 16, 1977No. 318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman.

The Panel having ruled from the bench at the hearing on this matter that the actions in this litigation raise common questions of fact and that their transfer to the Northern District of Georgia under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 will best serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation,

IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1407, the actions listed on the attached Schedule A and pending in districts other than the Northern District of Georgia be, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Northern…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Armored Car Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
  2. In Re Armored Car Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  3. Maryland v. Brink's, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API