Legal Opinion

Good Humor Corp. v. Femia

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Petitioner, upon a notice of motion, petition and exhibits, applies for an injunction pursuant to section 964 of the Penal Law. The respondent appeared on the argument of the motion without an attorney and has submitted no affidavit in opposition.

After reading the petition and examining the exhibits annexed thereto, this court is satisfied that the simulation by the respondent of the petitioner’s pictorial design, format and use of the words “ Good Bar ”, is a classical example of the unfair trade practices and competition, as well as conduct in the nature of commercial fraud, which section…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Fisher v. . Star Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Ball v. . Broadway BazaarNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Corning Glass Works v. Corning Cut Glass Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Santa's Workshop, Inc. v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramazzotti v. Banfi Products Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Robert Simmons, Inc. v. Simmons-King, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Tornado Industries, Inc. v. Typhoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API