Legal Opinion

Kiefer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 2, 2005No. 5D04-2731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawaya, J.

William Kiefer appeals the Judgment and Restitution Order contending that, with respect to some of the articles of personalty he stole from the victim, the trial court erred in imposing restitution in an amount that exceeds the value of those articles. The State cross-appeals the same order, claiming the trial court erred in devaluing the stolen property by fifteen percent for depreciation, where the record contains no evidence of how the trial court determined this to be the proper depreciation rate. We affirm as to all issues raised by Kiefer in the main appeal. As to the issue raised in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Noland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Ibrahim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Gliszczynski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Medlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. RACHELLE MARIE JAMES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API