Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1994No. 2-92-233-CVPublished

1Dissent

PAUL S. COLLEY, Justice Retired,

Sitting by Administrative Assignment dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

In this summary judgment case, appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereafter “State Farm”), filed suit in trial court cause # 348-138822-91, seeking a declaratory judgment against appellants, Valerie Harwell, administratrix of the estate of Tammy D. Hubbard, Deceased, (hereafter “Harwell”), Eric L. Leatherman and Eric Christopher Leatherman (hereafter “Leath-ermans”), seeking a decree that it had “no [legal] obligation to pay” a judgment rendered in trial court cause…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API