Legal Opinion
United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Garrido
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 21, 2009No. 3D09-1418PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.
This is a petition for second-tier writ of certiorari in a personal injury protection (“PIP”) case. We grant the petition.
Maria Garcia was insured by United Automobile Insurance Co. (“United Auto”). She was injured in an automobile accident and was treated by Dr. Eduardo J. Garri-do. Ms. Garcia assigned her PIP benefits to Dr. Garrido.
Dr. Garrido submitted his bills to United Auto, who did not pay them. Dr. Garrido brought suit.
Prior to trial, Dr. Garrido filed a motion in limine to bar the admission of the opinion of United Auto’s reviewing physician, Dr. Neil Fleisher. The motion explained…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Santa Fe Medical CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Chiropractic v. United Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metro Injury & Rehab CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hollywood Injury Rehab CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Central Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Professional Medical Group, Inc. v. United Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Ulloa v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Allstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. v. Hallandale Open Mri, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.