State ex rel. Russell v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Application filed in the supreme court September 1, 1920, for a writ of prohibition to the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., to restrain further proceedings in a cause, upon the denial of a motion for a change of venue.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Two transitory actions for damages were commenced in the superior court for Snohomish county by the Mustar Motor Company against C. E. Russell and wife, the relators herein. The relators appeared and filed a motion and affidavits for a change of venue, upon the ground that they were not residents of Snohomish county, but of Thurston county. The plaintiff, on the following day, filed an affidavit, setting forth that it was more convenient for the witnesses, and would better serve the ends of justice, to have the action tried in Snohomish county. Thereafter the relators filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Owen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. YakeyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Conley v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- In re Estate GeisslerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hand v. Superior Court for Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. Davis v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State Ex Rel. De Lape v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. D. R. Higley v. District Court of Carbon CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1929