Troth v. Millville Bottle Works
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 86 N. J. L. 558.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief Justice.
The present action was instituted in the Court of Common Pieas of Cumberland county under the "Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911. Pamph. L., p. 134. ,The plaintiff was a minor engaged in the service of the defendant company, and was injured by being struck in the eye with the handle of a mold-making machine which he was operating at the time of the injury. The trial court held that he ivas entitled to the benefits of the statute, and awarded him compensation accordingly. Upon review by the Supreme Court the award was affirmed,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Bohlinger v. Ward & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Atlas Trading Corp. v. S. H. Grossman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Bartlett's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.