Lammerding v. State

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

John Lammerding challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction of felony obstruction of law enforcement officers. The challenge is without merit, so we affirm the conviction.

On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and we no longer presume that the appellant is innocent.1 Moreover, we do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.2 Instead, we only determine if there is sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.3

Viewed in the…