Manson v. Sutterer
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; R. O. Brickell, Judge. Suit by H. T. Manson against John F. Sutterer. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff! appeals. Motion was made to strike the bill of exceptions on the ground that it contained questions and answers of witnesses Manson and Turnbull, and did not contain their evidence in narrative form. The testimony of these witnesses was obtained by taking their depositions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; R. O. Brickell, Judge. Suit by H. T. Manson against John F. Sutterer. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff! appeals. Motion was made to strike the bill of exceptions on the ground that it contained questions and answers of witnesses Manson and Turnbull, and did not contain their evidence in narrative form. The testimony of these witnesses was obtained by taking their depositions. Another ground was that the bill contained two bills of sale which were the same. Suit by appellant against appellee on a negotiable promissory note executed by the…
1Opinion
The Hanover National Bank was the holder of the defendant's (appellee's) note, sued on by Manson, the plaintiff, under an assignment thereof by the payee, the German Bank, to the Hanover National Bank, effectuated many months before the maturity of the note. Subsequent to the maturity of this note, it was sold by the Hanover National Bank in enforcement of that bank's rights to dispose of this note, along with other collateral, to gain proceeds to apply to the payment, pro tanto, of the German Bank's indebtedness to the Hanover National Bank. The note in suit was due November 3, 1914, bore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vogler v. MansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Agee v. MedlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Barbour v. Washington Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Cochran v. WheelerSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1834