Glanville v. David Hairstylist

When ihe employer (David Hairstylist) moved to dismiss, the appeal of the claimant (Eva Mae Glanville) from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission disallowing a. *164claim for compensation on the ground that the claimant had not paid the docketing costs until after the time for taking an appeal had expired, the Circuit Court for Carroll County (Weant, J.) granted the motion to dismiss with the remark that “maybe the Court of Appeals will straighten me out.” We shall do so.

The hearing on the claim for injuries sustained while the claimant was working for the employer was heard by…