Country-Wide Insurance v. Harnett
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a New York insurance company issuing automobile accident insurance, seeks to have declared unconstitutional two portions of New York’s “No-Fault” Insurance Law.1 Plaintiff attacks the provision permitting compulsory binding arbitration of certain disputes at the demand of any claimant (N.Y.Ins.Law § 675.2 (McKinney Supp. 1975)) and those requiring automatic renewal of the term of certain insurance policies.2 It is claimed that to permit the *1032invocation of the compulsory arbitration provision only at the option of the claimant violates the Equal…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re AdamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Lecates v. Justice Of The Peace Court No. 4 Of The State Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. HarnettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Christensen v. New Jersey, Division of Motor Vehicles (In Re Christensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Litchsinn v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.