Legal Opinion

Country-Wide Insurance v. Harnett

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 8, 1977No. 75 Civ. 6271 (GLG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a New York insurance company issuing automobile accident insurance, seeks to have declared unconstitutional two portions of New York’s “No-Fault” Insurance Law.1 Plaintiff attacks the provision permitting compulsory binding arbitration of certain disputes at the demand of any claimant (N.Y.Ins.Law § 675.2 (McKinney Supp. 1975)) and those requiring automatic renewal of the term of certain insurance policies.2 It is claimed that to permit the *1032invocation of the compulsory arbitration provision only at the option of the claimant violates the Equal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re AdamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  2. Lecates v. Justice Of The Peace Court No. 4 Of The State Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. HarnettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. Christensen v. New Jersey, Division of Motor Vehicles (In Re Christensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  5. Litchsinn v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API