Legal Opinion
State v. Roe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 8, 2014No. 2013-KA-1434PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
hThe defendants, Jason M. Roe (“Roe”) and Joshua A. Watson (“Watson”) appeal their convictions for armed robbery with a firearm (Count 1). Roe alone appeals his conviction for armed robbery with a firearm (Count 2); possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Count 3); and illegal possession of a stolen firearm (Count 4).
Finding no merit to any of Roe’s or Watson’s assignments of error as to their convictions on Count 1, but finding an error patent as to the sentence imposed on each of them for their convictions on this count, the convictions on Count 1 are…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ButlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. JenkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. LodgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. RoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- State v. MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.