Legal Opinion

Kend v. Chroma-Glo, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1970No. 5-70 Civ. 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVILLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed an action in the New York State court alleging a breach of contract and seeking recovery of certain sales commissions alleged to be due him. Since defendant was and is a foreign corporation with respect to New York, plaintiff availed himself of a remedy provided by New York Statute, McKinney’s Consolidated Laws of New York, C.P.L.R. § 6201, and procured a court order attaching certain funds due defendant from a New York source thereby obtaining quasi in rem jurisdic*548tion. The sheriff seized $42,181.86. Thereafter defendant removed the case from State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kaiser v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
  4. Wallace Glick, by His Next Friend, Bessie McGinty and Bessie McGinty v. Ballentine Produce, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. B. B. Weit Printing Co. v. Frances Denney, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Usdan v. Dunn Paper CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  2. Belgian American Mercantile Corp. v. De Groeve-Marcotte & FilsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Marketing Showcase, Inc. v. Alberto-Culver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API