Legal Opinion

Clair v. Zink

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided September 29, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00371Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION KELSEY SAINT CLAIR, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-00371 v. Judge Eli J. Richardson Magistrate Judge Alistair E. Newbern WILLIAM ZINK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Defendant William Zink has filed a motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Kelsey Saint Clair under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 37 (Doc. No. 43). Saint Clair opposes the motion (Doc. No. 45). For the reasons that follow, Zink’s motion will be denied. I. Background The issues addressed in Zink’s motion for sanctions were originally presented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calvin Berthelsen v. Maurice KaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United Consumers Club, Inc. v. Prime Time Marketing Management Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API