Cedyco Corp. v. Whitehead
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES KREGER, Justice.
Appealing from a summary judgment entered in favor of Anderson Martin Whitehead (“Whitehead”), Cedyco Corporation (“Cedyco”) raises two issues. First, Cedyco contends that the trial court “erred in entering summary judgment ... based on two broad requests for admissions, which were deemed admitted” and, second, Cedyco contends that the trial court “abused its discretion in refusing to grant the motion to undeem the requests for admissions.” From the substance of Cedyco’s first issue, we understand it as complaining of Whitehead’s failure to support his summary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, LLC v. Dulio Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Maswoswe v. Nelson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- Ara Arana, Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Arana, and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries Edgar Arana, Paola Arana, and Alexander Arana v. Victor Figueroa, Individually and D/B/A Victor Figueroa Construction, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
- In the Interest of N.L.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Petree v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.