Legal Opinion
Palomin v. Zarsky Lumber Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 3, 2000No. 13-98-352-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ.
Appellant Mario Palomin appeals from the denial of his petition for bill of review. 1 The petition was filed after a no-answer default judgment was entered against him and in favor of appellee Zarsky Lumber Co., d/b/a/ Zarsky Lumber Co., McAllen. By eight points of error, appellant generally contends the trial court erred (I) in entering the judgment because service was improper, and (2) in awarding attorney’s fees to appellee. We affirm.
A bill of review is an independent, equitable action brought by the petitioner to a former action seeking to set aside a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lal v. Harris Methodist Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Flores v. Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Layton v. Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Atwoood v. B & R Supply & Equipment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Estate of HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.