Legal Opinion

Coombs v. Brenklander

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the district court for Cherry county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J. cited: B. & M. R. Co. v. Crockett, 19 Neb., 138 ; Wilson v. Fuller, 9 Ran., 177; Yanclle v. Crane, 13 Id., 347; Hoisington v. Armstrong, 22 Id, 110; Morrison v. Lewis, 17 Jones & Sp. [N. Y.], 178; Llaggard v. Wallen, 6 Neb., 272; Carlson v. Small, 21 N. W. Rep. [Minn.], 480; Everett v. Buchanan, 6 N. W. Rep. [Dak.], 439.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

An action was commenced in the county court of Cherry county by Lee Coombs, to recover the possession of an Indian pony. Trial to a jury, with verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant prosecuted error to the district court, where the judgment of the county court was reversed and the cause was retained for trial. Coombs brings the case here on error. The petition in error filed in the district court assigns the following errors:

“ 1. The court erred in overruling motion for immediate trial, filed by defendant on the 14th day of March, 1887.
“ 2. Court erred in overruling defendant’s motion in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. LyonNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hill v. WilkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Belcher v. SkinnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moran v. McCullumNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API