People v. Battles
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn
The advent of DNA forensic technology in the late 1980s presented a dilemma for our legislators. On the one hand, the speedy trial statute forbad trial detention beyond 120 days without a trial. On the other hand, DNA evidence could take more than 120 days to generate.
The DNA analysis method exclusively in use at that time involved a test series that spanned several months. By the very nature of the method employed, any DNA testing was going to take a long time to complete. Moreover, several factors converged to assure significant delay before DNA testing could begin.
Normally, testing could…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ReimoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HughesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. DurhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. ExsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- United States v. Stanley E. AlgeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- People v. ColsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People v. DismukeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- People v. SwansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.