Legal Opinion

People v. Battles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 2000No. 5-97-1103PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn

The advent of DNA forensic technology in the late 1980s presented a dilemma for our legislators. On the one hand, the speedy trial statute forbad trial detention beyond 120 days without a trial. On the other hand, DNA evidence could take more than 120 days to generate.

The DNA analysis method exclusively in use at that time involved a test series that spanned several months. By the very nature of the method employed, any DNA testing was going to take a long time to complete. Moreover, several factors converged to assure significant delay before DNA testing could begin.

Normally, testing could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ReimoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. HughesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. DurhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. ExsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. United States v. Stanley E. AlgeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. People v. ColsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. DismukeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. People v. SwansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API