People v. Cooper
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Upon the papers before us, the County Court should have held a hearing upon defendants’ application for an order in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to determine whether defendants’ right to counsel and a fair trial was interfered with and impaired. (See, e.g., Matter of Fusco v. Moses, 304 N. Y. 424; Coplon v. United States, 191 F. 2d 749, certiorari denied 342 U. S. 926.) Accordingly, the County Court is directed to hold a hearing with respect to defendants’ specification that they were deprived of their right to counsel. Decision upon reargument of the appeal is withheld pending…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Fusco v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- People v. DurlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- People v. ArataNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- People v. ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Cooper v. DennoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.