Legal Opinion

People v. Cooper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the papers before us, the County Court should have held a hearing upon defendants’ application for an order in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to determine whether defendants’ right to counsel and a fair trial was interfered with and impaired. (See, e.g., Matter of Fusco v. Moses, 304 N. Y. 424; Coplon v. United States, 191 F. 2d 749, certiorari denied 342 U. S. 926.) Accordingly, the County Court is directed to hold a hearing with respect to defendants’ specification that they were deprived of their right to counsel. Decision upon reargument of the appeal is withheld pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Fusco v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. People v. DurlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. People v. ArataNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. People v. ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Cooper v. DennoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API