Dailey v. Industrial Commission
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ENOCH, Chief Judge.
Claimant, Stanley Dailey, seeks review of an order of the Industrial Commission allowing the State Compensation Insurance Fund to claim one-half of the total amount of Social Security Disability Benefits and cost of living increases thereto received by claimant and his dependents, as an offset against workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm.
Claimant’s first argument is that Colorado law does not allow the State Compensation Insurance Fund to reduce workmen’s compensation benefits when a recipient receives a cost of living increase in his or her Social Security Disability…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McClanathan v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Marinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATESupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Rusk v. Industrial Com'n of State of Colo.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Woody's Auto Parts v. RockCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.