Commonwealth v. Monteagudo
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review to consider whether the issue of egregious *485government conduct1 is for the judge or the jury. The Appeals Court concluded that the issue was for the judge. See Commonwealth v. Monteagudo, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 921 (1997). We agree with the Appeals Court in its reasoning and result. We affirm the defendant’s convictions of trafficking in cocaine and trafficking within 1,000 feet of a school.
1. The defendant acknowledged that he sold cocaine to an undercover State trooper on three occasions. He testified, however, that the trooper…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Bobby Ray MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CassidyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.