Legal Opinion
Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo, S.p.A.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 2013PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be modified, without costs, by reinstating the second cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed.
Plaintiff Giuseppe Romanello is a former executive of the financial services firm Intesa Sanpaola S.p.A. (Intesa). Plaintiff worked for Intesa and its predecessor for approximately 25 years when he became ill and unable to work. He was diagnosed with a series of disorders including major depression.
*883After plaintiff had been absent from work for almost five months during which time Intesa…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Williams v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Albunio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Phillips v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pimentel v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Jacobsen v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tafolla v. HeiligCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Williams v. MTA Bus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Vangas v. Montefiore Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Hosking v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.