Legal Opinion

Forstman v. Schulting

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886Published

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, P. J.:

This ease comes again before us upon an order for a reargument. The action was tried at Special Term and the complaint dismissed by that court, the court finding, as matter of fact, that the release sought to be set aside for fraud was executed in good faith, without any mistake on the part of the plaintiffs, and without any misrepresentation or concealment of material facts on the part of the defendant. Exceptions were filed to the findings of the court and a proposed case was made and served, and subsequently settled in the month of February, 1879; but it appears that the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatch v. . Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Dambmann v. . SchultingNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Smith v. . FrankfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Brown v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API