Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. X-Pert Well Service, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1988No. 10553PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Claimant appeals from the dismissal of his claim for workers’ compensation pursuant to the hearing officer’s order granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment. Our calendar notice proposed to affirm the hearing officer’s order dismissing the claim as being time barred. Claimant has filed a memorandum in opposition and respondents have filed a memorandum in support. Claimant has also filed a response to respondents’ motion in support of the calendar notice. We do not consider this response since such pleading is not contemplated by the appellate rules. In any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- ABF Freight System v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Knippel v. Northern Communications, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Martinez v. Wester Brothers Wholesale Produce Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Mountain States Mut. Cas. Co. v. SwopeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dingus v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Coslett v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994