Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Mayerhoff
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided December 18, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Friedman, J.
Defendants, husband and wife, were tenants of the claimants in Brooklyn, New York. A dispute arose regarding the payment of rent as a result of which the claimants commenced this small claims action for $1,700. After a trial on April 28, 1992 before another Judge of this court the claimants were awarded a judgment for the amount sued.
In an effort to collect the judgment, the claimants retained an attorney who served an information subpoena dated June 9, 1992 upon the First Nationwide Bank. In response to the information subpoena the bank stated that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Deary v. Guardian Loan Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Gordon v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- G. E. Weinstein v. GittersNew York Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cordius Trust v. KUMMERFELD ASSOCIATES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- McCarthy v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Distressed Holdings, LLC v. EhrlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Kitson & Kitson v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.