Legal Opinion

Ruble v. Ruble

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2005No. 32506PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM;

This case is before this Court upon appeal of a final order of the Circuit Court of Mo-nongalia County entered May 7, 2004. In that order, the circuit court held that the residuary clause of a holographic will1 was valid and that the residue of the decedent’s estate was to be distributed to the appellees and petitioners below, 'Albert and Betty Ruble (hereinafter “the Rubles”), in accordance with the terms of the holographic will.2 The appellants and respondents below, Donald Copeland and Maude Copeland (hereinafter, “the Copelands”), appeal the order believing that the circuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cox v. AmickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Keyser v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hobbs v. BrennemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tracie Wilson v. Tonya ParkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API