Legal Opinion

Prisco Serena Sturm Architects, Ltd., and Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 18, 1997No. 96-2441PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Torn between the desire to use common forms, which ought to lead to consistent results, and the need to tailor coverage to particular situations, the insurance industry often ends up with policies that are, to put it charitably, convoluted. This has led most states, including Illinois, to adopt rules requiring policies to be construed in the light most favorable to a finding of coverage, so that people who reasonably think they have insured themselves are not unpleasantly surprised when they submit a claim. Dora Township v. Indiana Ins. Co., 78 Ill.2d 376, 36…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dora Township v. Indiana Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Diamond State Insurance v. Chester-Jensen Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Monticello Insurance v. Wil-Freds Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. First Insurance Funding Corporation v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Lyerla v. AMCO InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. VIKING CONST. MAN. v. Liberty Mut. Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line LLC v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Viking Construction Management, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API