Legal Opinion
People v. Dillenbeck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We do not believe that it was error for the court to permit the prosecutor to read the prior sworn statement of Patricia Sanford to the jury as past recollection recorded. Defendant and Daniel Trice were charged with the murder of 17-year-old Arlene Tarkowski, whom they had allegedly abducted and tortured in an attempt to get her to work for them as a prostitute. At the time of defendant’s trial, Sanford had been living with Trice for approximately five years and he was the father of her five-month-old baby. It was her apartment at which Trice and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RajaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. CaprioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- People v. CaprioNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. TriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. DischerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- People v. RiggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009
- People v. BlydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.