Legal Opinion

Simpson v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1997No. D026249Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, Acting P. J.

The executor of the estate of Harold T. Simpson 1 used estate assets to pay more than $250,000 interest on delinquent estate taxes. The sole issue on appeal is the proper source of funding for this interest payment. Harold’s surviving wife, Verna Mae Simpson, contends, and the trial court agreed, the interest should have been paid from the corpus of Harold’s residuary estate. Harold’s daughter from a former marriage, Sally Ann White, contends the interest should have been paid from income earned on estate assets during the probate period. Viewing the terms of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Estate of McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Wakefield v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Simoncini v. DeMartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API