Succession of Caldwell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the Eourth District Court of New Orleans, Reynolds, J. BonforA & Finney contended that “ there was no necessity to insert in the judgment in an attachment suit a clause affirming, or recognizing the creditor’s rights under the attachment,” and cited C. P. 265, TuftSY. Ocvrradine, 3, An. 430. Harmon v. Paul Juge, fils, etal, 6An.768.HobiesY. her Husband, 9 Rob. 118. Gustine v. the Bank of Louisiana, 10 Rob. 418. Sergeant on Attachment, p. 20. Inés y.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Eourth District Court of New Orleans, Reynolds, J. BonforA & Finney contended that “ there was no necessity to insert in the judgment in an attachment suit a clause affirming, or recognizing the creditor’s rights under the attachment,” and cited C. P. 265, TuftSY. Ocvrradine, 3, An. 430. Harmon v. Paul Juge, fils, etal, 6An.768.HobiesY. her Husband, 9 Rob. 118. Gustine v. the Bank of Louisiana, 10 Rob. 418. Sergeant on Attachment, p. 20. Inés y. Sturgis, 12 Metcalf, 462. Dameport v. Tilton, 10 Metcalf, 320.
1Opinion of the Court
Eustis, O. J.
This appeal is taken .from a judgment of the Court of the Fourth District of New Orleans, rendered on a tableau of distribution filed by the curators of the succession.
J. S. Foley, one of the appellants, is a creditor of the succession by virtue of a subrogation to the rights oí J. & C. Forbes, plaintiffs in two certain suits commenced by attachment in the Third District Court of New Orleans, against Caldwell as an absentee. One of these judgments, to wit: No. 3805, for $1356 81 cts., was opposed by Henderson & Caines, subsequent attaching creditors, on the ground that no…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gammage v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Swift & Co. v. Leon Cahn & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Allen v. Delta Match Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Brown Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Gammage v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962