Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Allen v. International Harvester Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1991No. 1-90-1825PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI

delivered the opinion of the court:

Navistar International Transportation Corporation, successor in interest to International Harvester Company, filed a third-party action to enforce a contractual indemnity provision between it and third-party defendant, Freight Consolidation Services, Inc. (FCS). Navistar sought to enforce the indemnity agreement following a lawsuit filed against it by one of FCS’s employees who was injured while loading freight into an International Harvester trailer. FCS filed a motion to dismiss Navistar’s complaint, arguing that the occurrence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Elevator Co. v. LaSalle Monroe Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Owens v. Midwest Tank & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Pawnee Motor Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Smart v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles Sean Kruzits and Mary Kruzits v. Okuma MacHine Tool, Inc. Heller Financial, Inc. Gosiger, Inc. v. Vincent W. Visco, D/B/A Vistek Industries, Third-Party Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. McNiff v. Millard Maintenance Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Jokich v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Kruzits v. Okuma MacHine Tool, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. 933 Van Buren Condominium Assoc. v. West Van Buren, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API