Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Squier

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1950No. 177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

183 F.2d 67

TAYLOR

v.

SQUIER et al.

No. Misc. 177.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit

June 21, 1950.

Earl W. Taylor, in pro per.

No other appearances were entered.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and MATHEWS and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

2Per curiam

1

Congress has not given to a federal court of appeals jurisdiction to consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Nor has it given that court the power to allow appeals from judgments denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Such appeals are taken by filing a notice of appeal in the district court in which the adverse judgment…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mildred C. Trivette v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. Herbert Harrison Loum v. R. W. Alvis, Warden, Ohio State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Henry R. Anderson v. William L. Jones, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. John Ruble Stuart v. Lynn Bomar, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Buzzie v. HeinzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API