Fruehauf Corporation v. Elizabeth S. McIntire
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether an agreement signed by Elizabeth Mclntire, a married woman, was one of suretyship which under Georgia law could not bind her separate estate. Indeed it was. We affirm the summary judgment in her favor. 1
On December 3, 1963, the Fruehauf Corporation entered into a loan agreement with General Transport Company, the loan being secured by a chattel mortgage on certain General Transport hauling equipment. On December 4, 1963, Mrs. Mclntire signed an instrument executed the preceding day by her husband James Mclntire, which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jackson C. Floyd v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- J. W. Scarboro, Jr., and Mrs. Nan C. Scarboro v. Universal C. I. T. Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Wolkin v. National Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Durham v. GreenwoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southern Land & Development Company, Inc. v. Louise C. SilversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974