Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Corporation v. Elizabeth S. McIntire

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1969No. 26412_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, Circuit Judge:

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether an agreement signed by Elizabeth Mclntire, a married woman, was one of suretyship which under Georgia law could not bind her separate estate. Indeed it was. We affirm the summary judgment in her favor. 1

On December 3, 1963, the Fruehauf Corporation entered into a loan agreement with General Transport Company, the loan being secured by a chattel mortgage on certain General Transport hauling equipment. On December 4, 1963, Mrs. Mclntire signed an instrument executed the preceding day by her husband James Mclntire, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Jackson C. Floyd v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. J. W. Scarboro, Jr., and Mrs. Nan C. Scarboro v. Universal C. I. T. Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Wolkin v. National Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Durham v. GreenwoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Land & Development Company, Inc. v. Louise C. SilversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API