State ex rel. Selover v. Probate Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Arthur W. Selover as special administrator of the estate of Matilda Carlson, deceased, this court granted its alternative writ of prohibition directed to the probate court for Aitkin county, Hon. Frank Hense, as judge of probate for that county, and William T. Mount, requiring them to refrain from the exercise of any jurisdiction over the estate of said decedent and show cause why the writ should not be made absolute.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Matilda Carlson died intestate in Minneapolis in Eebruary, 1915. Upon the petition of her son the probate court of Aitkin county first assumed jurisdiction, appointed an administrator, and is proceeding to administer the estate; thereafter, upon the petition of the same *270son, the probate court of Hennepin county appointed relator special administrator of the same estate. A temporary writ of prohibition issued from this court against the probate court of Aitkin county, together with an order to show cause why a writ absolute should not issue against said court.
These appear to be the facts: In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Culver v. HardenberghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Bechtel v. BechtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Boltz v. SchutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Grier v. Estate of GrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- In Re Estate of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Richards v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Lipman v. BechhoeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.