Legal Opinion

United States v. Dennis Patrick Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1971No. 25859_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Sullivan was convicted on two counts of robbing two federally insured banks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). His principal contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in not severing the trials of Sullivan and his co-defendant Binning and in admitting Binning’s statement, which implicated Sullivan, in violation of his rights under Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). We affirm.

Well before the trial date, counsel for the government advised both defense counsel by letter that he intended to offer in evidence the oral admissions of Binning to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. D. H. Roe and Stratoray Oil, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Benjamin George Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KelloggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. United States v. Rajeh KazniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. United States v. Donald Gene GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Shaver v. Shaver (In Re Shaver)District Court, D. Nevada · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API