Neville v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before Hon. H. 0. Connor.
1Opinion of the Court
RAINEY, Chief Justice.
Appelleee sued to recover of appellants damages for building and operating a gin plant in such close proximity to his residence as to constitute a nuisance, and for an injunction restraining the operation thereof where located. Appellee alleged in substance that, by reason of the construction and operation of said plant, lint and dust have been blown into his house and his cistern; the noise of its operation has disturbed his family; that cotton seed have been allowed to decay and emit obnoxious odors; cattle allowed to tramp the ground around its standpipe or water…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wheeler v. Tyler Southeastern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
- Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- People v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Sloggy v. DilworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Kirby v. EstillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Jacksonville Ice & Electric Co. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- American Glycerin Co. v. Kenridge Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Crown Coach Company v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Northern Texas Traction Co. v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.