Legal Opinion
Palomo v. United States
District Court, D. Guam
Decided November 15, 1960No. Civ. 50-59PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILMARTIN, District Judge.
This is a motion, made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (1), 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.
The complaint alleges that the defendant leased certain realty from the plaintiff for the period July 1, 1951, to June 30, 1957; that during said time, employees of the defendant damaged the property in the sum of $155,557.45; and that the property has never been restored to its original condition. There are two causes of action set forth. The first paragraphs of the first and, by reference, second causes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- State Farm Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- New England Helicopter Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1955
- Colton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Birnbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Walter H. E. Jaeger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Boccardo v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- Sand v. Southeast State BankDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
- Karlen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.