Legal Opinion

Piccarreto v. Rochester General Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The procedural change permitted under rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice is inapplicable to enlarge the scope of examination beyond the scope allowed by a former order of examination granted prior to the time rule 121-a became effective. (People ex rel. Central New England By. Co. v. State Tax Comm., 261 App. Div. 416, 418; Matter of Potter, 106 Mise. 113, 115; Matter of Berkovitz v. Arbib & Houlberg, 230 N. Y. 261, 270; Lawson Co. v. Browne, 180 Mise. 1000; B’Apice v. Standard Oil Go. [N. J.], 203 Mise. 527.) Rule 121-a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Central New England Railway Co. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Veneri v. Mount Vernon HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wollen v. B. R. Dewitt, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API