Legal Opinion
Stanick v. T & B Metal Works, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 26, 2004No. 1D03-380PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
867 So.2d 523 (2004)
Charles G. STANICK, Appellant,
v.
T & B METAL WORKS INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
No. 1D03-380.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 26, 2004.
Charles G. Stanick, pro se, Lake City.
John D. Maher, General Counsel, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
In this unemployment compensation case, the appeals referee and the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission erred by failing to properly consider and apply section 443.101(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2002). The law provides that an unemployed worker…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Krulla v. Barnett BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Vajda v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
4Cited by3 opinions
- Borakove v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Humble v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Large v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006