Legal Opinion

State v. Tambera

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 13, 1916No. 22237PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding by the State against Vincent Tambera for forfeiture of his bail bond. On refusal to set aside forfeiture, Prank Defatta applies for writs of certiorari and prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

. LAND, J.

Vincent Tambera, charged with’ unlawfully keeping a public nuisance commonly called a blind tiger, was arrested, and admitted to bail in the sum of $500.00, on *413order of Judge T. F. Bell of the First judicial district court in and for the parish of Caddo.

The bond was executed by the said accused with relator as surety.

Subsequently an information was filed against the accused, charging that he “did unlawfully keep a blind tiger at 1423 Texas avenue, Shreveport, Caddo parish, La., in which said parish the sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited, by then and there keeping intoxicating…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BoasbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. State v. AnsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  3. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  4. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  5. State v. LoebSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JunesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. State v. BertrucciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API