Legal Opinion · Dissent

Verdon State Bank v. Smyth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1933No. 30,937Published

1DissentDawson, J.

A statute, so familiar as the one fixing the period of redemption following sales of real estate in foreclosure, cannot properly be considered apart from the decisions in which it has been expounded and applied. Why eighteen months for redemption from foreclosure in one case, and only six months in another? Because the statute says so. Quite so; but why does the statute say so? This court has explained this point time and again. In the recent case of Langworthy v. Martin, 129 Kan. 159, 281 Pac. 879, it was said:

“Appellant contends that the $7,500' mortgage which is foreclosed in the instant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruf v. GrimesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Lawrence National Bank v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Langworthy v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Woods v. WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Chastain v. WaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API