Glasser v. Kashinsky

In an action to recover on a money judgment, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated May 3, 1994, as, inter alia, denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), (7), and (8).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the causes of actions set forth in the complaint were sufficiently particular to give the parties notice of the transactions or occurrences intended to be proved and the material elements of each cause of action (see,…