United States v. Coleman, Dante N.

ORDER

In this direct criminal appeal, Dante Coleman argues that we should remand for resentencing because, he says, the district court made mistakes that will result in his serving more time in prison and on supervised release than the court intended. Coleman also argues that his overall prison term, as pronounced, is unreasonable. The government rejects the latter contention but concedes that resentencing would be appropriate to remedy “possible errors” by the district court.

Police in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, arrested Coleman in November 2004 after a car and foot chase. He was carrying a loaded…