Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Schisler, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2003No. Case No. 02CA2827Unpublished

1Concurrence

{¶ 44} I agree that we should grant the writ and order the records unsealed but for a different reason than the principle opinion. I cannot agree that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the applicant for an expungement because procedural errors, including failure to serve the prosecutor, occurred. Rather, it appears to me that the records "never lost their public status and are hereby open to the public(.)" because the trial court failed to comply with the statutory requirements set forth in R.C. 2953.32 and/or R.C. 2953.52. See, TheState ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. RadelOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API