Legal Opinion

Karley v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 10, 2000No. 2-99-022-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

In this medical malpractice case, Matthew Karley and Autumn Wernick (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment based on limitations in favor of Dr. J. Ardis Bell, Family Healthcare Associates, Family Healthcare Associates of Northeast Tarrant County, and Northeast Medical Clinic Association (collectively, Appellees). Because we hold that Appellees established as a matter of law that Appellants’ suit is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, we affirm the trial court’s order granting summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boyd v. KallamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Gilbert v. BartelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Rogers v. United Regional Health Care System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Donald Streich v. Dr. Joseph Dougherty, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Donald Streich v. Dr. Joseph Dougherty, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API