Legal Opinion

Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 17, 2017No. 11-275LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fifth Amendment Taking Claims; partial summary judgment; United States v. Sponenbarger, 308 U.S. 256 (1939); Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271(1939); the relative benefits test in flooding cases; government’s burden of proof.

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Senior Judge.

This inverse condemnation and breach of contract case is now before the court on the parties’ cross motions for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. The plaintiffs, Big Oak Farms, Inc. and twenty others, have filed suit on behalf of a proposed class of persons or entities that owned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API