Legal Opinion
State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 6, 1972No. 960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWAN, Judge.
The defendant appeals from an order denying a motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4)]. He was convicted of rape in 1965 and his conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court in State v. Sedillo, 76 N.M. 273, 414 P.2d 500 (1966). Thereafter he filed various motions to vacate the judgment and sentence, all of which were denied. An appeal was taken to the Supreme Court under Rule 93, supra, and was affirmed in State v. Sedillo, 79 N.M. 9, 439 P.2d 226 (1968). Another appeal, from a later denial of post-conviction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sanchez v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973