Legal Opinion

Badoloto v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 20, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries and damage to a motor truck resulting from a collision of the truck with a diesel engine of the defendant on March 16, 1954, at Clinton. The declaration is in two counts in each of which the negligence of the defendant is alleged. The case was first referred to an auditor and later submitted to a jury on his report. The case is here after verdicts for the plaintiff on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of its motion for directed verdicts; to the denial of a motion to strike out certain parts of the auditor’s report; to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fair v. Manhattan InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Papetti v. AlicandroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Sojka v. DlugoszMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Coakley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. McTighe v. Union Freight RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. NooneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Rosenston v. Bickford Shoes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Baldassare v. Crown Furniture Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Peretz v. WatsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Freitas v. Olson & Appleby, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API