Legal Opinion

Hackett v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

This, is a suit to recover, damages, by virtue of the statute, by reason of a death resulting, as it is alleged, from the negligence of the defendant. *5There was a collision between a train of the defendant and a trolley car. in which the decedent was a passenger.

As a matter of course, the plaintiff at the trial undertook to prove that the accident had been occasioned by the omission on the part of the company of those precautionary methods that were requisite in order to give notice of the approach of its train to the public…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. LeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  3. Succession of MaciasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API