Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1978No. 55269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

1. "In ruling on deprivation petitions, findings of fact should be made in accordance with CPA § 52 (a), Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a) (Ga. L. 1969, pp. 645, 646; 1970, pp. 170, 171). Code Ann. § 24A-2201 (a) (Ga. L. 1971, pp. 709, *565732); Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, 137 Ga. App. 817 (224 SE2d 806) (1976); see Coleman v. Coleman, 238 Ga. 183 (232 SE2d 57) (1977).” W. R. G. v. State of Ga., 142 Ga. App. 81 (235 SE2d 43). The trial judge failed to make such findings of fact and conclusions of law. We do not consider the following to comply with the criteria enunciated in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crook v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. In The Interest of A. A. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. W. R. G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. In the Interest Of: AagCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D. L. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Bradfield v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. In the Interest of J. R. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API